5 Steps to Implement ISO 17025 Decision Rule – How to Apply the Decision Rule in a Calibration Results

5 Steps to Implement ISO 17025 Decision Rule – How to Apply the Decision Rule in a Calibration Results

The international standard for laboratories that perform testing and calibration is ISO 17025. The application of decision rules is an important part of the standard. A set of criteria known as decision rules is used to determine whether or not a measurement result is valid. They are crucial to the laboratory’s ability to produce accurate and reliable results.

We will go over the five steps necessary to implement ISO 17025 decision rules in your laboratory and demonstrate how to incorporate them into calibration results in this blog post.

Step 1: Determine the Decision Rule

Choosing which rule to use is the first step in putting decision rules into action. Decision rules come in a variety of forms, including statistical, regulatory, and metrological ones. The choice of rule will be determined by the nature of the measurement and the requirements of the laboratory.

Step 2: Define the Acceptance Criteria

The acceptance criteria must now be defined following the determination of the decision rule. The limits within which a measurement result is considered valid are known as acceptance criteria. The measurement uncertainty in the laboratory should serve as the foundation for these criteria, which should be established in such a way as to guarantee the accuracy and dependability of the outcomes.

Step 3: Verify the Decision Rule

It is essential to confirm that the decision rule is appropriate for use in the laboratory before putting it into action. A validation study can accomplish this by analyzing a set of calibration results with the decision rule and comparing them to a reference value.

Step 4: Implement the Decision Rule

The decision rule can be used in the laboratory once it has been tested. This includes integrating the standard into the research center’s quality administration framework, preparing staff on the best way to apply the standard, and guaranteeing that the standard is reliably applied across all estimations.

Step 5: Monitor and Review

Last but not least, it is essential to keep an eye on and evaluate how the decision rule is being applied in order to guarantee that it is working and that the laboratory is delivering results that are trustworthy and accurate. This entails reviewing the results of the calibration on a regular basis, ensuring that the acceptance criteria are met, and adjusting the decision rule or acceptance criteria as necessary.

Now, let’s dive into how to apply the decision rule in calibration results.

The laboratory must first determine whether the measurement result meets the acceptance criteria before applying the decision rule. Assuming the estimation result falls inside the acknowledgment measures, it is viewed as substantial, and no further activity is vital.

The laboratory must decide whether the measurement result is acceptable or not if it does not meet the acceptance criteria. This is accomplished by comparing the measurement result to the decision limit, which is the decision rule’s maximum deviation from the reference value that is acceptable.

The measurement result is deemed acceptable and requires no further action if it falls within the decision limit. The laboratory must take the appropriate action, such as repeating the measurement, investigating the cause of the deviation, or adjusting the measurement method, if the measurement result falls outside the decision limit.

It’s important to remember that the decision rule and acceptance criteria should be checked on a regular basis to make sure they still work well and produce results that are reliable and accurate. Based on the laboratory’s experience and stakeholders’ feedback, modifications to the decision rule or acceptance criteria should be made if necessary.

To sum up, the 5 moves toward execute ISO 17025 choice principles and apply them in adjustment results are:

  • Select the decision rule that is appropriate for the laboratory’s needs and the kind of the measurement being conducted.
  • Establish the acceptance criteria based on the laboratory’s measurement uncertainty and define them in a way that assures trustworthy and accurate findings.
  • Validate the decision rule using a validation study that evaluates a set of calibration findings and compares them to a reference value.
  • Apply the decision rule by incorporating it into the laboratory’s quality management system, training workers on how to use it, and ensuring that it is uniformly implemented across all measurements.
  • Monitor and assess the decision rule’s execution by analyzing calibration results on a regular basis, ensuring that the acceptance requirements are satisfied, and making any required changes to the decision rule or acceptance criteria.

By implementing these five processes, laboratories may verify that their measurement findings are legitimate and consistent, as well as that they suit the needs of their stakeholders. Decision rules are an important aspect of ISO 17025, and laboratories must understand and implement them appropriately in order to deliver trustworthy and accurate findings.

In conclusion, adopting ISO 17025 decision criteria and incorporating them into calibration findings is critical for assuring the dependability and accuracy of a laboratory’s measurement results. Laboratories may generate valid and consistent findings that fulfill the expectations of their stakeholders by following the 5 stages indicated in this blog article and evaluating the decision rule and acceptance criteria on a regular basis.

Call us to discuss your calibration, test or repair needs at:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *